“I
know that most men, including those at ease
with problems of the greatest complexity,
can seldom accept the simplest and most obvious
truth if it be such as would oblige them
to admit the falsity of conclusions which
they have proudly taught to others, and which
they have woven, thread by thread, into the
fabrics of their life”.
Count Leo Nicolaevitch Tolstoy
1828-1910
|
 |
|
Compulsive
in his self-examination, self-destructive in his lifestyle, gender biased with his time but brilliant in observing his contemporary foes and friends,
Tolstoy’s opinion is traceable to the moral questions
that were central to his work and time, questions that continue
to linger and obsess our civilization where unbiased
peer review remains sine que non to scientific integrity.
For example,Trofim Lysenko, the Soviet agronomist, single-handedly
but with Stalin’s blessings, eliminated the science
of genetics by corrupting peer review. Alfred Wegener,
an astronomist and metereologist, who noticed the jigsaw fit
of West Africa and South America, found fossil evidence
to suggest they were once joined and proposed continental
drift. Wegener was ridiculed by geologists until his hypothesis became recognized as plate tectonics long after his death
in November 1930. When Sir Ronald A Fisher was knighted in 1953, each weighted average had its own variance. When geostatistics was hailed as a new science in the early 1960s, the distance-weighted average turned out to be the first and only weighted average that lost its variance during an honorific rebirth as a kriged estimate. Incredibly, the variance of the distance-weighted average was replaced with the pseudo kriging variance of a subset of some infinite set of kriged estimates. Incredible indeed!
|
The International
Association for Mathematical Geology (IAMG) has allowed peer review at the Journal of Mathematical Geology (JMG) to become corrupted in the extreme. Dr M Armstrong,
one of JMG's Assistant Editors and of IAMG's Ordinary Councilors, and Professor
Dr A G Journel, another JMG Assistant Editor, have been involved
with JMG’s peer review since its inception. These
scholars and scores of anonymous thinkers have systematically
rejected mathematical statistics and sustained geostatistics by turning peer review into a blatantly biased, shamelessly self-serving sham. |